In reply to Hon. M.J. ELLIOTT (8
July) and answered by letter on 14 September.
The Hon. DIANA LAIDLAW:
1. I am aware that I have previ-ously ex-plained that
the De-partment of Environment Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs (DEHAA)
is supporting the selective narrowing of the coastal zone in order to ensure
that the zone does not include less environmentally sensitive land that
is more appropriately located within a general rural zone.
In the Mount Lofty Ranges Region, all rural zones (both within
the Watershed and Primary Production areas) are governed by very strict
land division controls that prevent the creation of any new allotments
and allow boundary adjustment only where it is required in order to facilitate
primary production. There are also compre-hen-sive controls over the design
and siting of dwellings which aim to reduce visual impact.
Therefore, any selective narrowing of the coastal zone in the
Ranges cannot result in any further allot-ments being created, or a proliferation
of prominently visible dwellings in the zone.
In order to reinforce the prevention of `ribbon development'
along the coast I have asked Planning SA to raise the following matters
with DEHAA and local Councils in the context of any proposed amendments
to the provisions for the coastal zone and the adjacent rural zonesó
|
|
Site assisted by Intramedia
Design