The Hon. IAN GILFILLAN: I seek leave to make a brief explanation
before asking the Treasurer, representing the Premier, a question about
the National Wine Industry Centre.
Leave granted.
The Hon. IAN GILFILLAN: Members would have read, as I did, on
17 August in the Advertiser that a $17 million privately funded South Australian
wine centre was about to be built in Grote Street in the city. In fact,
that building work has already started. According to the press report,
two directors of Australian Wine Distributors Limited, Mr Colin McLeod
and Mr Pua Hor Ong, are planning the centre on the site of the former Adelaide
Girls' High School on the corner of Morphett Street.
The Hon. M.J. Elliott: A good location.
The Hon. IAN GILFILLAN: This siteóand the interjection, I must
say, mirrors my next commentóis very close to the Gouger Street restaurant
precinct and the Adelaide Central Market and therefore will have the benefit
of being able to link the best of South Australian wine to the best South
Australian food. It is also within easy walking distance of the major city
hotels. The $17 million private enterprise initiative comes at a time when
the State Govern-ment is planning what could be described as a rival $40
million wine industry centre in contrast to the private initiative.
The Government proposal involves taking at least $35 million
from the State taxpayers, with possible top up from the Commonwealth taxpayers,
and handing it to the wine industry. The Government proposal is to take
2.9 hectares of what is currently the Botanic Gardens and turn over the
land to a profit making concern. The Government proposal is for a building
of 15 metres height, which is the equivalent of at least a four storey
building, with no restric-tion on its going higher. The Government proposal
conflicts with the Adelaide City Development Plan in regard to minimising
buildings on parklands and not restricting public access.
The Government proposal requires $5 million of earth-works to
flood proof the site. The Government proposal involves constructing on
parklands parking space for at least 148 cars because, it is anticipated,
most visitors will drive and not walk from the city. The Government proposal
removes the centre from the city's restaurant and food district and it
will, of course, be in direct competition with the private industry proposal.
My questions to the Treasurer are:
1. Will the Government at long last now rethink its commitment
to the proposed parklands site for the National Wine Industry Centre?
2. Will it enter negotiations with Mr Ong and Mr McLeod to try
to merge the two proposals on the Grote Street site and capture the advantage
of locating in the city's food and restaurant district, rather than on
parklands?
3. Will the Government explore any other site and, in particular,
the newly available Glenside Hospital site?
4. Will the Government explain to taxpayers why it is proposing
still to spend the $35 million of taxpayers' money to compete against a
$17 million private enterprise develop-ment?
The Hon. R.I. LUCAS: I will take advice from the Premier and
any other appropriate Minister on the honourable member's question but,
I would imagine, the answer to the question whether the Government will
move the Wine Centre from its proposed site will be `No'.
|
|
Site assisted by Intramedia
Design